I worked as a professional cellist (symphony, opera, ballet) in Belgium and California during the 1980s. I left the field because, even though I had steady full-time work, the pay was not sufficient for raising a family. It costs a lot to produce a symphony concert, and ballet and opera are even more expensive. There has not been a thriving audience for classical music for some decades, and we'll likely end up with just a few orchestras, and even fewer operas and ballets - only in major cities. It's a question of scale. If, as a musician, you tour to earn a living, say with a string quartet, it's likely that you have to charge more for your concert tickets than what most people are willing to spend. In doing so, you diminish your audience, and STILL don't earn enough to make it worthwhile professionally. I am of course not talking about well-known ensembles and soloists, who can generally manage if they're willing to spend a good chunk of their lives on the road.
But to tell the truth, I don't think we "need" all that many ***professional*** musicians. We should encourage our children to enjoy participating in music, playing instruments, singing, etc. One advantage of the Internet is that people can distribute recordings of their own musical performances at minimal cost. It is not live performance, but then again, nothing is preventing these same people from performing locally. Yes; we should encourage high standards, but we should also be realistic in terms of what professional opportunities are likely to exist over the next 5-10 years.
Tags:
Share
Facebook
You need to be a member of All Things Strings to add comments!
Join All Things Strings